Article
Do-It-Yourself Accessibility
Page: 1 2
1. Bobby
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines explain how to make multimedia content, such as images and video, more accessible to a wider audience, and Bobby checks for the accessibility issues described in these guidelines.
Bobby can provide automatic checks for only a limited number of accessibility problems. For instance, it's is useful for locating missing text alternatives to visuals and for checking for untidy HTML coding. But more is needed to ensure that a site is accessible to all users.
For example, Bobby can't evaluate a site for layout consistency, ease of navigation, provision of contextual and orientation information, or the use of clear and easy to understand language. Nor can the program check what a site will look like without graphics or colours, under different resolutions, or using different font sizes or through a text-only browser.
As such, Bobby produces a very large report, much of which consists of recommendations that the site's author conduct manual checks (which may actually turn out to be unnecessary).
2. A-Prompt
http://aprompt.snow.utoronto.ca/
A-Prompt is a stand-alone tool developed at the University of Toronto. Developers install the program on their own computer, and specify which file they would like to evaluate. The program then takes the user through a wizard-style succession of questions and answers, at the completion of which the file is updated to incorporate any changes the developer has made upon recommendation by the software.
Although A-Prompt makes recommendations based on sound principles, the actual changes to the file are made by the developer, so this person still needs to have a solid understanding of the underlying principles of accessibility.
3. Lift Online
LIFT (UsableNet, 2000) is a core semantic analysis technology that's packaged in several forms by UsableNet to meet various developer and tester needs.
It was first released in April, 2000 as a usability analyser, but naturally progressed to include accessibility over the past year. Basically LIFT is a software Web analysis engine that can be applied in several ways.
A Web-based trial is available (at the UsableNet home page), which will evaluate five pages starting at a specified URL (you can repeat that process with as many URLs as you want).
LIFT is also available for purchase as a Macromedia Dreamweaver product, which adds to Dreamweaver menus options that allow the developer to test for accessibility.
4. 508/W3C Accessibility Suite for Macromedia Dreamweaver and Dreamweaver UltraDev
This free extension was developed by UsableNet and offers developers the ability to check individual pages or even an entire site against a customizable set of accessibility guidelines.
The 508 Accessibility Suite offers a comprehensive set of tests similar to LIFT Online. Perhaps most important, it takes advantage of the authoring environment of Dreamweaver to point the Web content designer/developer to specific places on the page in need of revision.
5. The Wave
http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
The Wave is a tool that helps people perform those tasks that require human judgment (e.g. "Does this ALT text a functional equivalent for this image?" "Does this reading order make sense?").
The Wave:
- displays the ALT text of images, and higlights areas on the page for comparison with the images
- provides numbered arrows to show the linearized reading order
- shows the HTML equivalent (if any) provided for applets
- performs automatic checks (detects missing or suspicious ALT text)
However, at this time its fcuntionality far from covers all accessibility checkpoints.
6. HTML and CSS Validators
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
The HTML Validator and CSS Validator from the W3C are particularly helpful for advanced users. These free tools don't check for accessibility issues; rather, they check for the proper use of HTML and CSS.
This is mostly helpful for designers and developers who know HTML and CSS but not the relevant techniques that help improve accessibility. The HTML and CSS validators can spot incorrect coding and indicate possible solutions.
Accessibility Made Easy
Accessibility is no longer a nice-to-have -- it's essential to the Web's evolution. Validation should include a combination of automated and manual checks.
The automated tools look for apparent problems with the accessibility of a page, while the manual checking methods generally address the continuity and flow of content. But in all cases, the goal is to make information accessible to as many users in the target audience as possible. Don't let the rules get in the way of allowing all visitors to get the information they need, and sparing them the information they do not.